Key Points
- Core Scientific’s board unanimously recommends shareholders vote in favor of its $9 billion all-stock acquisition by CoreWeave.
- The deal faces vocal opposition from its largest shareholder, Two Seas Capital, citing undervaluation and risks.
- Approval would realign Core Scientific’s assets toward AI infrastructure markets but leaves exposure to downside in CoreWeave’s share price.

Core Scientific has formally urged its shareholders to support the proposed merger with CoreWeave, describing it as the optimal path forward. The appeal comes amid growing tension over the valuation and structure of the deal, which intersects with the broader race for AI infrastructure assets and consolidation in data center markets.
Deal Terms and Strategic Rationale
The proposed transaction would see CoreWeave acquire Core Scientific in an all-stock deal valued at approximately $9 billion, implying $20.40 per share for Core Scientific’s stock. Shareholders would receive 0.1235 newly issued CoreWeave shares for each Core Scientific share held. According to the board’s presentation, the merger promises meaningful synergies: cost savings, reduced leasing exposure, and operational efficiencies drawn from consolidation of power assets and data infrastructure.
Board members emphasize that the merged entity would better position itself in the AI infrastructure space, leveraging Core Scientific’s energy-intensive facilities to support demand for large-scale training and compute workloads. This strategy seeks to align with an AI ecosystem increasingly constrained by power and data center capacity.
Opposition from Major Shareholder
Despite the board’s unified backing, the transaction is not without fierce resistance. Two Seas Capital, which holds around 6.3% of Core Scientific’s shares, has publicly declared its intention to vote against the sale. According to Two Seas, the deal materially undervalues Core Scientific and places its shareholders at risk if CoreWeave’s stock declines further post-merger.
The criticism centers on the all-stock structure: since the value of the deal depends entirely on CoreWeave’s future share performance, any weakness in the acquirer’s stock could erode gains. Moreover, Two Seas has suggested that more protective mechanisms—such as a collar or minimum price protection—should be built into the agreement to shield Core Scientific investors from volatility.
Market Reaction & Risks to Execution
Following the board’s urging, Core Scientific shares rose nearly 4% in after-hours trading, suggesting some investor confidence in the message. Yet, underlying market sentiment remains mixed. Observers note that CoreWeave’s share price has already fallen significantly since the deal’s announcement, reducing implied merger value and heightening downside risk.
Further execution challenges loom: regulatory approvals, integration of operations, and realization of synergies are never guarantees in complex mergers. If CoreWeave fails to manage power contracts or operational scaling effectively, the anticipated benefits may not materialize. Moreover, any negative surprise on AI demand or capital constraints could strain the combined balance sheet.
Looking forward, all eyes will be on the upcoming shareholder vote (scheduled for late October) and any amendments to the deal structure that might address downside protections. Monitoring CoreWeave’s stock trajectory, near-term earnings reports, and regulatory developments will be crucial to assessing whether this merger becomes a defining pivot in the AI infrastructure consolidation wave.
Comparison, examination, and analysis between investment houses
Leave your details, and an expert from our team will get back to you as soon as possible
* This article, in whole or in part, does not contain any promise of investment returns, nor does it constitute professional advice to make investments in any particular field.
To read more about the full disclaimer, click here
- Lior mor
- •
- 7 Min Read
- •
- ago 1 minute
Trump’s EV Retreat Is a Major Coup for His Top Trade Rival
President Trump’s retreat from aggressive EV policy marks more than a domestic repositioning—it grants a strategic advantage to his chief
- ago 1 minute
- •
- 7 Min Read
President Trump’s retreat from aggressive EV policy marks more than a domestic repositioning—it grants a strategic advantage to his chief

- Lior mor
- •
- 8 Min Read
- •
- ago 4 hours
Is Silicon Valley’s AI Spending Spree Building the Future — or Inflating the Next Tech Bubble?
The New Arms Race in Artificial Intelligence Silicon Valley is deep into an unprecedented capital surge aimed at securing dominance
- ago 4 hours
- •
- 8 Min Read
The New Arms Race in Artificial Intelligence Silicon Valley is deep into an unprecedented capital surge aimed at securing dominance

- Articles
- •
- 5 Min Read
- •
- ago 10 hours
UBS: Three Key Reasons Behind the Continued Rally in the S&P 500 Bull Market
UBS, the investment bank, published an optimistic outlook this week, stating that the S&P 500 rally is far from over
- ago 10 hours
- •
- 5 Min Read
UBS, the investment bank, published an optimistic outlook this week, stating that the S&P 500 rally is far from over

- Articles
- •
- 6 Min Read
- •
- ago 12 hours
The Passive Power of 401(k): How Retirement Flows Inflate the Magnificent Seven
Working Americans are funneling an average of $2,358 annually from their 401(k) savings directly into the Magnificent Seven — Apple, Microsoft, Alphabet, Amazon, Meta,
- ago 12 hours
- •
- 6 Min Read
Working Americans are funneling an average of $2,358 annually from their 401(k) savings directly into the Magnificent Seven — Apple, Microsoft, Alphabet, Amazon, Meta,