Warner Bros. Discovery Downgraded to Junk: Is the Era of “Fallen Angels” Returning?

A dramatic announcement published last Tuesday shook up the media giant Warner Bros. Discovery Inc. (WBD) as Moody’s Ratings downgraded its debt to “junk” status. This move, professionally termed a “fallen angel,” comes just a few years after the company issued one of the largest highly-rated bond deals in market history. The downgrade to Ba1, the highest tier in the junk category, from Baa3, the lowest in investment grade, marks a significant turning point for the company and the global bond markets.

Moody’s decision is not an isolated one; it follows a similar downgrade by S&P Global Ratings in May, and another cut earlier this week by the same firm. These downgrades, which follow Warner Bros. Discovery’s announcement of its intention to split into two independent companies—one focusing on its rapidly growing streaming business and the other on its struggling traditional media channels—deepen the financial complexity facing the giant. The spin-off plan, which aims to “free” the growing streaming business from the constraints of the older channels, presents bondholders with a complex dilemma, requiring them to make significant decisions.

The downgrade directly impacts approximately $31 billion of the company’s debt, which will no longer be eligible for Bloomberg’s high-grade bond index. This step is expected to make Warner Bros. Discovery one of the largest issuers of junk bonds, although the exact extent of the migration to the high-yield index is not yet entirely clear, as the company is repurchasing bonds. The new financial situation, including the drop to junk status, further complicates Warner Bros. Discovery’s discussions with its bondholders. Bondholders are faced with deciding whether to sell their securities back to the company, thereby waiving key protections on their remaining Warner Bros. bonds. This dilemma highlights the importance of financial covenants and contractual protections in the corporate bond market.

Structural Changes and Financial Policy: The Reasons Behind the Downgrade

According to Moody’s, the downgrade reflects Warner Bros. Discovery’s ongoing operational challenges, coupled with a change in its debt structure to include secured debt. The company plans to refinance over $14 billion of unsecured notes as part of the spin-off plan, using $17.5 billion in secured bridge financing. This move, in essence, places new creditors ahead of unsecured noteholders. “Governance, and particularly a change in the company’s financial policies, were key drivers of the rating action,” Moody’s stated. This statement shines a spotlight on the importance of corporate governance and prudent financial policies in the eyes of rating agencies.

The bond repurchase plan has forced investors to make difficult choices. Investors who sell back their notes must agree to waive certain protections associated with other bonds they hold. This development underscores the delicate balance between debt management and maintaining investor confidence. It is worth recalling that the company’s formation in 2022 was accompanied by a $30 billion debt sale, one of the largest to date. This sale, which was then seen as a resounding success, now stands in stark contrast to the company’s current situation, as it grapples with significant rating challenges.

Looking Ahead: Implications of the Downgrade for Warner Bros. Discovery and the Capital Market

The downgrade of Warner Bros. Discovery’s rating to “junk” carries broad implications, both for the company and for the capital market. First, the company’s financing costs are likely to rise significantly, as investors will demand higher yields for debt perceived as riskier. Second, the company may encounter difficulties in raising future capital, especially from institutional investors who are restricted from investing in companies with investment-grade ratings. Third, Warner Bros. Discovery will now find itself competing for the attention of junk bond investors, a market with different characteristics and players than the high-grade bond market.

Furthermore, Warner Bros. Discovery’s case serves as a warning sign for other companies, especially in the rapidly changing media industry. The massive shift to streaming, the challenges facing traditional business models, and the constant need to adapt to technological and consumer changes, place heavy financial and structural demands. How Warner Bros. Discovery navigates its way through this new financial reality, and particularly how it succeeds in achieving its spin-off goals under such significant rating pressure, will serve as an interesting and important case study for both the media and finance industries. Will the company be able to regain market confidence and climb back to investment-grade ratings, or will it be forced to contend with a harsher economic reality in the long run? The answer to this question largely depends on the implementation of sound financial policies, business adaptability, and making the right strategic decisions.

Warner Bros. Discovery Downgraded to Junk: The Return of “Fallen Angels”?

A dramatic announcement released last Tuesday reshuffled the cards for media giant Warner Bros. Discovery Inc. (WBD), as Moody’s Ratings downgraded its debt to “junk” status. This move, professionally termed a “fallen angel,” comes merely a few years after the company issued one of the largest highly-rated bond deals in market history. The downgrade to Ba1, the highest tier in the junk category, from Baa3, the lowest investment-grade tier, marks a significant turning point for the company and global bond markets.

Moody’s decision is not an isolated one; it follows a similar downgrade by S&P Global Ratings in May, and a further cut earlier this week by the same firm. These downgrades, occurring after Warner Bros. Discovery announced its intention to split into two independent companies—one focusing on its rapidly growing streaming business and the other on traditional media channels facing challenges—deepen the financial complexities facing the conglomerate. The proposed split, intended to “unshackle” the growing streaming business from the constraints of legacy channels, presents bondholders with a complex dilemma, requiring them to make significant decisions.

The downgrade directly impacts approximately $31 billion of the company’s debt, which will no longer be eligible for inclusion in Bloomberg’s high-grade bond index. This step is expected to make Warner Bros. Discovery one of the largest issuers of junk bonds, although the exact extent of the migration to the high-yield index remains unclear as the company is repurchasing bonds. The new financial status, including the fall to junk rating, further complicates Warner Bros. Discovery’s discussions with its bondholders. Bondholders are faced with the choice of whether to sell their securities back to the company, thereby relinquishing key protections on other Warner Bros. bonds they hold. This dilemma underscores the importance of financial covenants and contractual protections in the corporate bond market.

Structural Changes and Financial Policy: The Reasons Behind the Downgrade

According to Moody’s, the downgrade reflects Warner Bros. Discovery’s ongoing operational challenges, coupled with a change in its debt structure to include secured debt. The company plans to refinance over $14 billion of unsecured notes as part of the split, using $17.5 billion in secured bridge financing. This move effectively places new creditors ahead of unsecured noteholders. “Governance, and in particular a change in the company’s financial policies, were key drivers of the rating action,” Moody’s stated in its announcement. This statement highlights the critical importance of corporate governance and sound financial policy in the eyes of rating agencies.

The bond buyback plan has forced investors to make difficult choices. Investors who sell their notes back must agree to give up certain safeguards on other bonds they hold. This development underscores the delicate balance between debt management and maintaining investor confidence. It is worth recalling that the company’s formation in 2022 was accompanied by a $30 billion debt sale, one of the largest to date. This sale, then seen as a resounding success, now stands in stark contrast to the company’s current situation, as it grapples with significant rating challenges.

Looking Ahead: Implications of the Downgrade for Warner Bros. Discovery and the Capital Market

The downgrade of Warner Bros. Discovery to “junk” status carries broad implications, both for the company and for the capital markets. First, the company’s financing costs are likely to increase significantly, as investors will demand higher yields for debt perceived as riskier. Second, the company may face difficulties in raising future capital, especially from institutional investors who are restricted from investing in companies with investment-grade ratings. Third, Warner Bros. Discovery will now find itself competing for the attention of junk bond investors, a market with different characteristics and players than the high-grade bond market.

Furthermore, the case of Warner Bros. Discovery serves as a cautionary tale for other companies, particularly within the rapidly evolving media industry. The massive shift to streaming, the challenges facing traditional business models, and the constant need to adapt to technological and consumer changes impose heavy financial and structural demands. How Warner Bros. Discovery navigates its new financial reality, and specifically how it succeeds in achieving its split objectives under such significant rating pressure, will serve as an interesting and important case study for both the media and financial industries. Will the company be able to regain market confidence and climb back to investment-grade ratings, or will it be forced to contend with a harsher economic reality in the long term? The answer to this question depends heavily on the implementation of prudent financial policies, business adaptability, and sound strategic decision-making.


Comparison, examination, and analysis between investment houses

Leave your details, and an expert from our team will get back to you as soon as possible

    * This article, in whole or in part, does not contain any promise of investment returns, nor does it constitute professional advice to make investments in any particular field.

    WHY ADOBE (ADBE) SHARES ARE FALLING TODAY
    • orshu
    • 16 Min Read
    • ago 26 minutes

    WHY ADOBE (ADBE) SHARES ARE FALLING TODAY WHY ADOBE (ADBE) SHARES ARE FALLING TODAY

    Factors Contributing to the Decline of Adobe (ADBE) Shares Today<\/h2> Today, many investors are scratching their heads as they watch

    • ago 26 minutes
    • 16 Min Read

    Factors Contributing to the Decline of Adobe (ADBE) Shares Today<\/h2> Today, many investors are scratching their heads as they watch

    THE 2025 STOCK MARKET RALLY IS ABOUT MORE THAN JUST THE ‘MAGNIFICENT 7’: MORNING BRIEF
    • orshu
    • 16 Min Read
    • ago 47 minutes

    THE 2025 STOCK MARKET RALLY IS ABOUT MORE THAN JUST THE ‘MAGNIFICENT 7’: MORNING BRIEF THE 2025 STOCK MARKET RALLY IS ABOUT MORE THAN JUST THE ‘MAGNIFICENT 7’: MORNING BRIEF

    Analyzing the Economic Factors Driving the 2025 Stock Market Rally Beyond the 'Magnificent 7'<\/h2> The 2025 stock market rally is

    • ago 47 minutes
    • 16 Min Read

    Analyzing the Economic Factors Driving the 2025 Stock Market Rally Beyond the 'Magnificent 7'<\/h2> The 2025 stock market rally is

    Inflation in Europe: Mixed Signals Ahead of Key ECB Policy Decisions
    • orshu
    • 7 Min Read
    • ago 2 hours

    Inflation in Europe: Mixed Signals Ahead of Key ECB Policy Decisions Inflation in Europe: Mixed Signals Ahead of Key ECB Policy Decisions

    Fresh inflation data released this morning from several European economies paint a nuanced picture of the continent’s pricing environment. While

    • ago 2 hours
    • 7 Min Read

    Fresh inflation data released this morning from several European economies paint a nuanced picture of the continent’s pricing environment. While

    WHY WALMART AND AMAZON ARE REPORTEDLY CONSIDERING THEIR OWN CRYPTO STABLECOINS
    • orshu
    • 17 Min Read
    • ago 2 hours

    WHY WALMART AND AMAZON ARE REPORTEDLY CONSIDERING THEIR OWN CRYPTO STABLECOINS WHY WALMART AND AMAZON ARE REPORTEDLY CONSIDERING THEIR OWN CRYPTO STABLECOINS

    The Implications of Walmart and Amazon Entering the Stablecoin Market<\/h2> As the world continues to evolve technologically, the rise of

    • ago 2 hours
    • 17 Min Read

    The Implications of Walmart and Amazon Entering the Stablecoin Market<\/h2> As the world continues to evolve technologically, the rise of