hero

April 9, 2025

A sharp escalation in trade tensions between China and the United States has prompted leading global investment banks to revise down their growth forecasts for the world’s second-largest economy. In just one week, both nations imposed significant new tariffs on each other’s goods, deepening concerns over global trade flows and undermining China’s near-term growth outlook.

A New Wave of Tariffs – And a Direct Hit to Growth

Citi was among the first institutions to respond to the renewed tensions, lowering its 2025 GDP forecast for China from 4.7% to 4.2%. Analysts at the firm noted that prospects for a new trade agreement between Washington and Beijing appear “extremely limited” following the latest developments.

Natixis followed suit, cutting its forecast to 4.2%, down from 4.7%. While Morgan Stanley and Goldman Sachs have maintained their projections at 4.5% for now, both warned of mounting downside risks tied to trade volatility.

U.S. President Donald Trump announced that an additional 50% tariff on Chinese goods would take effect on Wednesday, pushing the cumulative increase in U.S. import duties on Chinese products to 104% since the beginning of 2025. In retaliation, Beijing raised tariffs on all American imports by 34%, further straining bilateral trade relations and clouding export prospects.

China’s Exposure – Quantifying the Damage

Goldman Sachs estimates that an initial 50% tariff hike could shave 1.5 percentage points off China’s GDP, with a second wave reducing output by another 0.9 points. According to the bank, much of the economic impact from tariffs has already materialized, suggesting diminishing marginal effects from further escalation.

Chinese exports to the U.S. currently represent about 3% of national GDP, comprising approximately 2.35 percentage points in domestic value-added and 0.65 points from related manufacturing investment. Consequently, extended disruptions in bilateral trade channels are expected to weigh heavily on China’s domestic economic engine.

Mutual Dependency – But the Leverage Tilts Toward Washington

Although the U.S.-China conflict is often framed as a standoff between equals, the economic reality reveals a deeper dependency on the Chinese side. While China is a key trading partner for the U.S. in terms of imports, exports to the U.S. make up around 3% of China’s GDP—compared to less than 1% of U.S. GDP that relies on Chinese demand. Moreover, Chinese firms are more directly exposed to tariff shocks due to their export-oriented model and dependence on access to advanced markets.

In contrast, the U.S. economy is more diversified, with domestic consumption accounting for nearly 70% of GDP, giving Washington greater short-term bargaining power. Still, in the long run, a sustained trade war could also hurt American companies with significant exposure to China, particularly in tech, automotive, and financial services, while accelerating a broader decoupling that may be costly for both sides.

Beijing’s Next Move – Rate Cuts and Fiscal Stimulus?

Amid growing pressure, Beijing has signaled it may resort to monetary and fiscal measures to support domestic growth. Interest rate cuts, increased government spending, and infrastructure investment are all on the table, especially as the official 2025 growth target of “around 5%” becomes increasingly difficult to attain under current conditions.

According to Shehzad Qazi of China Beige Book, Beijing’s policy response options are becoming more limited, undermining its leverage in the trade standoff. Nevertheless, some economists argue that the marginal impact of new tariffs is diminishing, reducing the overall effectiveness of U.S. pressure.

Looking Ahead – Key Data Incoming

 

China is scheduled to release March trade figures next Monday, followed by Q1 GDP data on April 16. These indicators will be crucial in assessing the short-term economic toll of the latest trade escalation. Any material deviation from expectations could trigger swift market reactions and policy responses, both in Beijing and Washington.


Comparison, examination, and analysis between investment houses

Leave your details, and an expert from our team will get back to you as soon as possible

    * This article, in whole or in part, does not contain any promise of investment returns, nor does it constitute professional advice to make investments in any particular field.

    To read more about the full disclaimer, click here
    SKN | European Markets Sell Off Sharply as Broad Risk Aversion Returns Across the Region
    • orshu
    • 8 Min Read
    • ago 3 hours

    SKN | European Markets Sell Off Sharply as Broad Risk Aversion Returns Across the Region SKN | European Markets Sell Off Sharply as Broad Risk Aversion Returns Across the Region

    European markets opened the week under heavy pressure on Monday, January 19, 2026, as a wave of risk aversion swept

    • ago 3 hours
    • 8 Min Read

    European markets opened the week under heavy pressure on Monday, January 19, 2026, as a wave of risk aversion swept

    SKN | Is Sequoia Breaking the Rules of Venture Capital by Backing AI Rivals?
    • sagi habasov
    • 8 Min Read
    • ago 12 hours

    SKN | Is Sequoia Breaking the Rules of Venture Capital by Backing AI Rivals? SKN | Is Sequoia Breaking the Rules of Venture Capital by Backing AI Rivals?

    Sequoia Capital’s reported decision to invest in Anthropic marks a striking departure from one of Silicon Valley’s most deeply held

    • ago 12 hours
    • 8 Min Read

    Sequoia Capital’s reported decision to invest in Anthropic marks a striking departure from one of Silicon Valley’s most deeply held

    SKN | Is Europe Preparing a $108 Billion Trade Counterstrike Over Trump’s Greenland Threats?
    • sagi habasov
    • 8 Min Read
    • ago 15 hours

    SKN | Is Europe Preparing a $108 Billion Trade Counterstrike Over Trump’s Greenland Threats? SKN | Is Europe Preparing a $108 Billion Trade Counterstrike Over Trump’s Greenland Threats?

    European leaders are weighing one of their most aggressive trade responses in years as tensions with Washington escalate over President

    • ago 15 hours
    • 8 Min Read

    European leaders are weighing one of their most aggressive trade responses in years as tensions with Washington escalate over President

    SKN | Where Did Meta’s Metaverse Vision Go Wrong — And What Replaced It?
    • sagi habasov
    • 7 Min Read
    • ago 17 hours

    SKN | Where Did Meta’s Metaverse Vision Go Wrong — And What Replaced It? SKN | Where Did Meta’s Metaverse Vision Go Wrong — And What Replaced It?

    When Mark Zuckerberg rebranded Facebook as Meta in late 2021, the move was framed as a generational pivot — a

    • ago 17 hours
    • 7 Min Read

    When Mark Zuckerberg rebranded Facebook as Meta in late 2021, the move was framed as a generational pivot — a